Forum Jump:


This SHOULD be our best team since ‘22…
#1
And will be our best defense since ‘21.   Also, might be the best OL we’ve put on the field in a LONG time.   

TE’s are good enough to protect the unproven WR’s early.   

IF we get decent safety play the secondary will be special.   DL is very solid.  

I’ll try to get a position review up sometime over the next week.   

This is the team you wait for most years.   We will see how it translates.
Reply
#2
(Yesterday, 04:05 AM)Replying to DawgNatty And will be our best defense since ‘21.   Also, might be the best OL we’ve put on the field in a LONG time.   

TE’s are good enough to protect the unproven WR’s early.   

IF we get decent safety play the secondary will be special.   DL is very solid.  

I’ll try to get a position review up sometime over the next week.   

This is the team you wait for most years.   We will see how it translates.

You should not type such deep parody as some readers here do not recognize sarcasm, gallows humor, and magical thinking as what they really are. You are mocking us, are you not?

Mean, you are just plain mean. Dodgy
Reply
#3
(Yesterday, 04:58 AM)Replying to Shootist Comitatus
(Yesterday, 04:05 AM)Replying to DawgNatty And will be our best defense since ‘21.   Also, might be the best OL we’ve put on the field in a LONG time.   

TE’s are good enough to protect the unproven WR’s early.   

IF we get decent safety play the secondary will be special.   DL is very solid.  

I’ll try to get a position review up sometime over the next week.   

This is the team you wait for most years.   We will see how it translates.

You should not type such deep parody as some readers here do not recognize sarcasm, gallows humor, and magical thinking as what they really are. You are mocking us, are you not?

Mean, you are just plain mean. Dodgy

Ha, nah, you and I see the world exactly the same on many many things.     I’m just a little more glass half full on the team than you.   

My concerns:  (in order)

WR stepping up.   
Clemson safety transfer
Gunner progress.   
Coaching - OC and DC. 
RB depth  
DL
Reply
#4
Sacks- Explosive Runs - WR room /downfield passing.

Gunner/Bobo.
[Image: iOvLDN1.jpg?1] [Image: 1VWtPlw.jpg?1] [Image: CK0zHIu.jpg] [Image: yTj6tPw.jpg?1] [Image: Nhc7kqD.jpg?1] [Image: J3gH23f.jpg?1] 
.
[Image: XL6hRLC.jpg?1] [Image: 5sF0KCy.jpg] [Image: Krtkq7L.jpg?2] [Image: zhgbCrH.jpg?1]
Reply
#5
Ditto what TRD says!
Reply
#6
Gunner will be Gunner, solid but not spectacular. I hope the coaches have taught him to look downfield at least a little bit.
WR room won't be a big deal either way. Screen passes don't need elite WR play.
DL will be the same crew as last year. Maybe they have learned how to pressure a QB over the off season.
RBs should be strong as long as they stay healthy. I'm not sure we have much quality depth there.

D overall should be solid. I still don't see a dominant D lineman who can single handedly disrupt an opposing offense.

Bobo is still a huge liability. Schumann is pedestrian but Kirby's presence will keep the D coaching top level. Muschamp's absence was evident last season.
Reply
#7
(Yesterday, 04:05 AM)Replying to DawgNatty And will be our best defense since ‘21.   Also, might be the best OL we’ve put on the field in a LONG time.   

TE’s are good enough to protect the unproven WR’s early.   

IF we get decent safety play the secondary will be special.   DL is very solid.  

I’ll try to get a position review up sometime over the next week.   

This is the team you wait for most years.   We will see how it translates.

Agree.  They need some WR’s to step up and no key injuries, but this is a well-built team that can win it all.
Reply
#8
Agree with JC, we missed Muschamp in the defensive huddle.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Playwire

Advertise on this site.

Privacy Policy
HairoftheDawg.net is an independent website and is not affiliated with The University of Georgia. © HairoftheDawg.net All rights reserved
NOTE: The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of HairoftheDawg.net.